![]() ![]() Parties other than the respondent-intervenor states told the court that case should be held in abeyance pending the resolution of any forthcoming challenges to EPA's reinstatement of California's waiver. Joint motion to govern further proceedings filed. Those states argued that Clean Air Act’s provision for the California waiver violated the equal-sovereignty doctrine and that the 2019 suit presented “a golden opportunity to resolve the equal-sovereignty question that has dogged California’s special status for years.” Circuit denied a request by states that had intervened to defend revocation of California’s waiver to allow the case challenging the waiver revocation to move forward. Circuit will hold these cases in abeyance while it considers lawsuits challenging the Biden administration’s revised greenhouse gas emissions standards for 2023 and later model year light-duty vehicles, fuel economy standards for model years 2024-2026, and reinstatement of California’s waiver. ![]() Circuit Court of Appeals issued orders that will continue to hold in abeyance cases filed in 20 that challenge the Trump administration’s greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for model year 2021-2026 light-duty vehicles, the 2019 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rule preempting state limits on tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions and zero-emission vehicles mandates, and EPA’s withdrawal of California’s waiver for such regulations. Courts Holding Challenges to Trump-Era Vehicle Standards and Policies in Abeyance While Challenges to Biden Reversals Proceed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |